Method guide

Separation distance calculation under IEC 62305-3

The separation distance s is how far unbonded metal must stay from a lightning protection system so a strike cannot spark across. This guide sets out the IEC 62305-3:2024 formula, where each coefficient comes from, a worked example, and how NFPA 780 and AS 1768 do the same job.

Air terminals and copper conductors along a building parapet, the parts a lightning protection system is built from

The separation distance s is the minimum gap between a lightning protection system and any unbonded metal near it.

When lightning current runs down an air termination and a down conductor, that conductor rises to a very high voltage compared with the pipes, cable trays, handrails and roof plant around it. If one of those parts is too close and is not bonded, the voltage can jump the gap as a spark, which can start a fire or put people at risk. IEC 62305-3:2024 clause 6.3 calculates how big the gap must be.

The calculation is short. Three coefficients and one length go in, and one distance comes out: s = (ki / km) × kc × l. The care goes into choosing each input. This guide explains every term, gives the values IEC 62305-3:2024 sets for them, works one example, and shows how NFPA 780-2026 and AS 1768:2021 answer the same question with formulas of their own. For where the separation distance sits in a full design, read lightning protection system design.

The formula

Two ways to calculate s

IEC 62305-3:2024 gives a simplified approach and a general one. Both multiply the same class coefficient by the length of conductor the current has travelled, and both divide by the same material coefficient. They differ in how they treat the current sharing.

  • Simplified approach, clause 6.3.2, equation (6): s = (ki / km) × kc × l. One current-sharing coefficient kc applies to the whole length l.
  • General approach, clause 6.3.1, equation (5): s = (ki / km) × (kc1 × l1 + kc2 × l2 + ... + kcn × ln). The path is split into segments, and each segment carries its own share of the current.

The simplified approach is the one most designs use, because Table 13 gives kc from the number of down conductors alone. The general approach earns its extra work on tall or meshed systems, where the current spreads out as it travels down and a single kc would overstate the distance needed lower on the structure.

What l measures. l follows the conductors. Start at the point where the gap is being checked and follow the air termination and then the down conductor until you reach the closest bonding point or the earth termination. It is a conductor length, not a straight-line height. Under a continuous metal roof that acts as a natural air termination, the length along the air termination can be left out (clause 6.3.1 NOTE 1).
The coefficients

Where ki, km and kc come from

Each coefficient is read from its own table in IEC 62305-3:2024. The values below are the ones Lumex™ holds for the 2024 edition, each with the table it comes from.

CoefficientWhat it depends onValuesSource
kiThe class of LPS, which follows from the lightning protection levelClass I: 0.08. Class II: 0.06. Class III: 0.04. Class IV: 0.04Table 11
kmThe insulating material in the gapAir: 1. Concrete, brick or wood: 0.5Table 12
km, stand-offsAn insulating stand-off of FRP, PE or PVC0.7, from a stand-off length of 0.5 m; otherwise the value the manufacturer declaresTable 12 NOTE 1
km, materials in seriesA gap made of more than one materialThe lowest km of the materials presentTable 12 NOTE 2
kcThe number of down conductors sharing the currentOne down conductor: 1 (isolated LPS only). Two: 0.66. Three or more: 0.44Table 13
kc, Type A earthingEarth electrodes whose resistances differ widely1, where one electrode has more than twice the resistance of its neighbourNote to Table 13

Every value is from IEC 62305-3:2024 (Ed.3). The class of LPS that sets ki is not chosen by preference: it follows from the lightning protection level, which the IEC 62305-2 risk assessment computes. For how the level maps onto the class, read lightning protection levels (LPL I to IV).

Worked example

A rooftop air handler beside a down conductor

The building in this example is invented to show the arithmetic. The coefficients are the IEC 62305-3:2024 values in the table above.

  • The risk assessment calls for a Class II lightning protection system, so ki = 0.06 (Table 11).
  • The system is attached to the building and has four down conductors, so the simplified approach takes kc = 0.44 for three or more (Table 13). The earthing is Type B, a ring electrode, so the note on Type A electrodes does not apply.
  • An unbonded metal air handler stands on the roof. The gap between it and the nearest roof conductor is open air, so km = 1 (Table 12).
  • The conductor path from the point nearest the air handler, along the roof conductor and down to the earth ring, is 10 m long, so l = 10 m.

Then s = (0.06 / 1) × 0.44 × 10 = 0.264 m. The air handler must sit more than about 26 cm from the roof conductor. If it sits closer, it is bonded to the system instead.

Now suppose the same check runs through a brick parapet rather than open air. Table 12 gives km = 0.5, and the distance doubles: s = (0.06 / 0.5) × 0.44 × 10 = 0.528 m. Solid material holds off less voltage per metre than air, so it needs a wider gap. With only two down conductors, kc would rise to 0.66 and the open-air distance would grow to 0.396 m, which shows why adding down conductors is a real design lever. To run the same check on your own figures, use the free separation distance calculator.

Pass means greater than s. Clause 6.3.1 asks for a distance greater than s, so a gap exactly equal to s does not pass. A loop in a down conductor is judged on its own rule: clause 5.3.4 asks that the two points of the loop be no less than s apart. An electrically insulated system is judged on the equivalent separation distance its manufacturer declares (clause 6.3.1 with 5.5.4).

Shortcuts and limits

When the simple numbers are not enough

A few rules change how the inputs are read. Each one has caught designs out.

  • Structure height as the length. Clause 6.3.2 NOTE 1 lets the height of the structure stand in for l, but only where the smaller of its length and width is no more than three times its height.
  • Altitude. Clause 6.3.2 asks for an altitude correction when the system is installed at higher elevations, by reference to IEC 60071-2. A correction for elevation only ever lengthens the distance.
  • A single down conductor. Table 13 allows kc = 1 for one down conductor only on an isolated system, one held clear of the structure.
  • A declared kc. Clause 6.3.1 NOTE 2 accepts kc from a more detailed calculation. It is a share of the lightning current, so it sits above 0 and no higher than 1, and the calculation behind it should be on file.

Annex B of IEC 62305-3:2024 refines kc from the layout. For a wire air termination between two masts, Figure B.1 gives kc = (h + c) / (2h + c), with h the mast height and c the distance between the masts. For a system with four or more down conductors, Figure B.2 gives kc = 1/(2n) + 0.1 + 0.2 × the cube root of (c/h), where n is the number of down conductors, c the distance to the next one and h the spacing between ring conductors, or the height where there are no rings. It holds for c and h between 3 m and 20 m, and the standard describes it as an approximation for roughly cubic structures. Figures B.3 and B.4 give per-segment values for ring conductors at several levels and for meshed air terminations, which is where the general approach of equation (5) comes in.

Under NFPA 780 and AS 1768

The same question, three formulas

All three standards scale the gap with the length of conductor the current has travelled, ease it as more down conductors share the current, and widen it through solid material. The coefficients are not interchangeable, so work each job to the standard it is built to.

QuestionIEC 62305-3:2024NFPA 780-2026AS 1768:2021
What it is calledSeparation distance s (clause 6.3)Bonding distance D (4.15.2)Separation distance (Equation 3.6.3)
Formulas = (ki / km) × kc × l, equation (6)D = (l / 6n) × Km, equations 4.15.2.5.1 and 4.15.2.6.1Protection level factor times down conductor factor, divided by insulation factor, times length
Protection level termki by class of LPS (Table 11)None; NFPA 780 has no protection levelsA protection level factor (Table 3.2, simplified values)
Current sharing termkc (Table 13 or Annex B)n: 1 for one down conductor, 1.5 for two, 2.25 for three or more, counting those near the bond (4.15.2)A down conductor factor (Table 3.2)
Material termkm: 1 in air, 0.5 in concrete, brick or wood (Table 12)Km: 1 in air, 0.50 in dense materialAn insulation factor (Table 3.2)
LengthBack to the nearest bonding point or the earth terminationTo the nearest grounding electrode, or on tall structures the nearest equalization pointBack to the nearest bonding point or the earth termination

Each cell is our summary of the clause cited. For the NFPA rules on what gets bonded and when, read NFPA 780 grounding and bonding. For the Australian rules, read AS 1768 earthing, which also covers the Appendix E advice on keeping bonding conductors short.

How Lumex™ handles it

A separation check that shows its working

In Lumex™ the class of LPS comes out of the IEC 62305-2:2024 risk assessment, and the separation distance is worked from the layout you record: the down conductors, the earthing arrangement, the materials in each gap and the conductor lengths. Each check names the table or figure behind every coefficient and the equation it used.

A check the inputs cannot support is refused with a message saying what is missing, rather than computed from a guess. A separation distance that looks satisfied because a value was assumed is the very hazard clause 6.3 exists to prevent. For the rest of the internal LPS, read about lightning protection zones and bonding and SPD types, or see the full list of terms in the glossary.

FAQs

Questions answered

What is the separation distance in lightning protection?

The separation distance s is the smallest gap allowed between a lightning protection system and nearby conductive parts that are not bonded to it. During a strike the current raises the protection system to a high voltage, and a part that sits closer than s can be reached by a dangerous spark. IEC 62305-3:2024 clause 6.3 sets out how to calculate s.

What is the IEC 62305-3 separation distance formula?

The simplified approach of IEC 62305-3:2024 clause 6.3.2, equation (6), is s = (k_i / k_m) × k_c × l. Here k_i depends on the class of LPS (Table 11), k_m on the insulating material in the gap (Table 12), k_c on how the lightning current divides between down conductors (Table 13 or Annex B), and l is the length of conductor from the point being checked back to the nearest bonding point or the earth termination.

What are the k_i values for each class of LPS?

IEC 62305-3:2024 Table 11 gives k_i = 0.08 for a Class I lightning protection system, 0.06 for Class II, and 0.04 for both Class III and Class IV. The class itself follows from the lightning protection level that the IEC 62305-2 risk assessment arrives at, so the risk result feeds straight into the separation distance.

What is k_m in the separation distance formula?

k_m is the material coefficient for the insulation in the gap. IEC 62305-3:2024 Table 12 gives 1 for air and 0.5 for concrete, brick or wood. Its NOTE 1 allows 0.7 for an insulating stand-off of FRP, PE or PVC that is at least 0.5 m long, or a value the manufacturer declares. Where several materials sit in series, NOTE 2 says to use the lowest k_m.

How is k_c chosen?

k_c is the fraction of the lightning current carried by the conductor being checked. For the simplified approach, IEC 62305-3:2024 Table 13 gives 1 for a single down conductor (isolated LPS only), 0.66 for two and 0.44 for three or more. With Type A earthing, the note under the table sets k_c = 1 when one earth electrode has more than twice the resistance of its neighbour. Annex B gives more precise values from the layout.

What happens if the separation distance cannot be met?

Bond the part instead. Clause 6.3.1 asks for an actual distance greater than s between the protection system and the part. Where the geometry will not allow that, the part is connected to the lightning protection system by equipotential bonding under clause 6.2, so there is no voltage difference left to drive a spark. Adding down conductors also helps, because it lowers k_c and so lowers s.

Does NFPA 780 use the same separation distance formula?

No. NFPA 780-2026 uses a bonding distance instead: D = (l / 6n) × Km, from equations 4.15.2.5.1 and 4.15.2.6.1. Here l is the conductor length to the nearest grounding electrode or equalization point, n reflects how many down conductors share the current, and Km is 1 through air or 0.50 through dense material. Grounded metal closer than D must be bonded.

How does AS 1768 calculate separation distance?

AS 1768:2021 Equation 3.6.3 gives the separation distance as a protection level factor multiplied by a down conductor factor, divided by an insulation factor, multiplied by the length of conductor back to the nearest bonding point or the earth termination. Table 3.2 gives simplified values for the three factors. The shape matches IEC 62305-3, but use the AS values on an Australian job.

What Lumex™ does, and what stays with you

Lumex™ computes the method of the standard you choose, IEC 62305-2:2024, AS 1768:2021 or NFPA 780-2026, and shows the working. It does not certify a structure. You may not issue or submit a Lumex™ output until a competent person, qualified where the structure is located, has reviewed the inputs and the result and signed it.

The tolerable risk in IEC 62305-2 is not a fixed constant. Clause 7.3 NOTE 1 gives RT = 1 × 10⁻⁵ per year as a representative value of tolerable risk and adds that another value may be set once the case has been investigated in detail. Printed p.12 then lets national or local regulations fix RT, the tolerable frequency of damage FT, and the Annex A, B, C and E calculation rules and parameter values. Every IEC 62305-2 assessment in Lumex™ states the jurisdiction it was computed under and the values that applied.

Get started today

Every separation check worked from the layout, with the table behind each coefficient