How it works

IEC 62305 risk assessment, computed clause by clause

Lumex runs the complete IEC 62305:2024 procedure, not a simplified estimator, so every number traces back to the clause and coefficient you can defend.

A glass-clad high-rise reflecting blue sky and clouds, the kind of structure an IEC 62305 risk assessment evaluates
Clause 5

Four risks, each held to its own line

IEC 62305:2024 judges four fronts on their own terms: life (R1), service (R2), heritage (R3) and economic loss (R4). Each is tested against its tolerable threshold RT, and every verdict traces back to the clause behind it.

R1 · RT = 10⁻⁵/yr

The risk to
human life

Touch and step voltages, plus fire after a strike, put people in danger. R1 holds the strictest limit of all.

R2 · RT = 10⁻³/yr

The risk to
public services

The power, water, gas and signal a community leans on. R2 measures what happens when a strike knocks them out.

R3 · RT = 10⁻⁴/yr

The risk to
cultural heritage

Historic buildings and the treasures inside cannot be rebuilt, so damage from one strike stays with us for good.

R4 · cost-benefit

The risk to
economic value

Weighed on a plain cost and benefit basis, R4 tells you whether paying for lightning protection is worth it.

Clause 6 & Annexes A–C

Eight risk components

Every risk is the sum of components; each component = dangerous-event rate (N) × probability of damage (P) × loss factor (L).

Comp. Source & cause Belongs to
RADirect flash to the structure causing touch and step voltagesR1
RBDirect flash to the structure causing dangerous sparking and fireR1, R2, R3, R4
RCDirect flash to the structure causing internal system failure (LEMP)R1, R2, R4
RMNearby flash inducing failure of internal systemsR1, R2, R4
RUFlash to a connected line causing touch voltage indoorsR1, R4
RVFlash to a connected line causing fire or explosion via the serviceR1, R2, R3, R4
RWFlash to a connected line causing internal system failureR1, R2, R4
RZFlash near a connected line inducing internal system failureR1, R2, R4
Five steps

From flash density to a verdict you can defend

Every component follows the same chain. Lumex carries each named number through, so you can read the trace from the first input to the final pass or fail.

Collection area (Annex A)

Ad = L·W + 2·(3H)·(L+W) + π·(3H)²

How much ground around the building attracts a strike, from its length, width and height. Adjacent and line-attracted areas (Am, Al, Ai) follow the same annex.

Dangerous-event rate

Nd = NG · Ad · CD · 10⁻⁶

How many strikes per year that area can expect. NG is the local ground flash density (flashes / km² / yr); CD is the location factor.

Probability of damage (Annex B)

PB from LPS class · PSPD from SPD coordination · PTA, PEB

How likely a strike is to actually cause damage. Protection measures lower P. An LPS of Class I drives PB to 0.02; a coordinated Type 1 SPD set drives PSPD to 0.01.

Loss factor (Annex C)

LA, LB, LC from rp · rf · hz · LX

How much is lost if damage does happen. Fire-protection (rp), fire-risk (rf) and special-hazard (hz) factors scale the typical loss values.

Component and risk

RX = N · P · L, then R1 = Σ components, then compare to RT

Each component is N times P times L. Add the components for a risk, then compare the total to RT for a clear pass or fail.

Worked example · IEC 62305:2024

R1 fails. One upgrade makes it pass

A real data centre, assessed clause by clause. Same inputs, same maths Lumex runs on every project, with the verdict you can defend.

The building & inputs

RPG Bhiwadi DC

Data centre · Zone Z2 · Rajasthan

Risk assessedR1 · Loss of human life
NG ground flash density8.4 / km²·yr
Existing LPSClass III · PB=0.10
Tolerable risk RT1.0×10⁻⁵ /yr

The verdict, traced

As built · Class III LPS

R1 = 2.4×10⁻⁵

exceeds RT 1.0×10⁻⁵

Fail

Fix: upgrade to LPS Class II, dropping PB to 0.05.

After fix · Class II LPS

R1 = 4.8×10⁻⁶

within RT 1.0×10⁻⁵

Pass

Every figure here is computed, not estimated, straight from IEC 62305:2024. Run the same trace on your own building in minutes.

Join the waitlist
AI copilot · on the roadmap

AI speeds the routine. The engine still owns every number

You just saw the deterministic trace. Planned for launch, AI works around that engine to cut the busywork, with the signing engineer in control at every step.

Analysis

Risk-driver analysis

Reads the completed trace and shows which component drives each risk, so you know exactly where to act.

Reporting

Drafted report narrative

Turns your computed figures into clear report prose you review, edit and approve before it is filed.

Mitigation

Ranked mitigation options

Suggests protection upgrades and ranks them by their effect on R1 to R4, with the maths shown for each.

Inputs

Early fail flags

Flags risks likely to exceed RT as you enter inputs, long before you reach the final verdict.

The standard series

Where Lumex fits the standard series

62305-1

General principles

Lightning parameters & damage model that underpin Lumex's terminology and LPL definitions.

62305-2 · core

Risk management

The full procedure Lumex implements: R1–R4, all eight components, every annex coefficient.

62305-3

Physical damage & life

LPS classes and the §E.7 periodic-inspection report referenced by Lumex.

62305-4

Electrical & electronic systems

SPD coordination and LEMP-protection factors feed the PSPD and PM inputs.

Lumex computes the IEC 62305 procedure across all four parts, but it remains an assessment tool: final responsibility for every result rests with the signing engineer, and Lumex does not replace professional judgement or the published standard.

Get started today

Every result traced to a clause, every report ready to file

Contact our team